HomeDevice Trust Platform › Lorika vs JumpCloud
Comparison Guide

Lorika vs JumpCloud

JumpCloud is broad: open directory, IAM, SSO, MDM/UEM, RADIUS, Conditional Access — one bundle. Lorika is deep posture: 190+ checks, eight frameworks, audit-ready evidence. Different shapes; many fleets run both.

The fundamental difference

🧰

JumpCloud: unified open directory

JumpCloud bundles identity, SSO, RADIUS, MDM/UEM, patch management, and Conditional Access into one platform. Strength: one vendor, one bill, one operator UI for IAM and basic device management. It answers: "How do we run identity and device management without stitching together five SaaS vendors?"

🔐

Lorika: focused posture & evidence

Lorika does one thing well: continuous device-posture measurement, framework-mapped, with audit-ready evidence. It answers: "Is every device in my fleet configured to a security baseline, and can I produce signed evidence for SOC 2 / ISO 27001 auditors?"

Side-by-side comparison

Capability JumpCloud Lorika
Primary purpose Unified directory + IAM + UEM Device posture & compliance evidence
Identity directory / IAM ✓ Core capability ✗ Not in scope
SSO & RADIUS ✓ Bundled ✗ Out of scope
MDM / UEM (config push) ✓ Policy push, patch, app install ✗ Observation only
190+ posture checks Policy-based subset ✓ 8-category coverage including kernel + SSH + audit log
CIS / NIST / ISO 27001 / SOC 2 / PCI DSS / NBU mapping Compliance Reports module ✓ 8 frameworks built-in + custom builder
CVE scanning per installed package Limited via Patch Management ✓ OSV.dev matching, severity breakdown
BYOD & contractor laptops Enrolment-friction-heavy ✓ Voluntary install, read-only
Conditional Access ✓ Native Signal source — direct integration on roadmap
Cross-platform parity (Mac / Windows / Linux) ✓ Yes ✓ Yes, all 190+ checks across all three
Real-time Security Score (0–100) ✗ Pass / fail status ✓ Per-device, severity-weighted, time series
Pricing model Per-user bundle ($11–24/user/month) Per-device, free up to 10
Free tier 10 users / 10 devices ✓ 10 devices, 190+ checks, 8 frameworks

When to use which

JumpCloud is a good fit when you want one operator UI for IAM + UEM and you are willing to accept "good enough" posture depth. Lorika fits where audit teams demand framework-mapped evidence and per-device depth across kernel, SSH, packaging, and audit-log controls.

🎯

JumpCloud is best for

Small-to-mid teams replacing Okta + Jamf + Patch-Management-vendor with one platform. Cross-platform SSO and RADIUS. Basic Conditional Access on a small budget.

📊

Lorika is best for

Teams that need SOC 2 Type II evidence, ISO 27001 control mapping, or per-device depth on kernel/SSH/audit-log/CVE controls. Linux-heavy fleets. BYOD without enrolment.

🔗

Together they cover

JumpCloud runs the directory, SSO, RADIUS, and Conditional Access. Lorika provides the deep posture signal that Conditional Access consumes — and the audit evidence the JumpCloud Compliance Reports module does not produce on its own.

Related comparisons

See how Lorika compares with other categories in your security stack:

Add deep device posture to your JumpCloud-managed fleet

Free forever for personal use. Works alongside JumpCloud. Framework-mapped evidence auditors actually accept.

Start free — up to 10 devices →